The holiday season and winter sales represent a pivotal period for e-commerce businesses, retailers, and payment service providers (PSPs). However, after the frenzy of sales, another reality sets in: the surge in returns and disputes. These situations, though predictable, can prove costly and demand rigorous financial management.
In the United States in 2021, 39% of online shoppers returned items (source: Mondial Relay), with peak activity recorded in January. This trend has only grown over the years; in 2023, 44% of online shoppers (source: Statista) returned at least one product. On top of this, refunds and chargebacks present major challenges in transaction reconciliation and financial management for e-commerce businesses. How can these complexities be anticipated and managed? This article explores the challenges and potential solutions.
Massive returns generate logistical expenses (transportation and inventory management), time losses for teams, and an increase in chargebacks. When examining the complete cycle of a return, additional costs for the e-commerce business arise at nearly every stage.
To better understand the cumulative costs a return can generate, consider this scenario :
An online clothing retailer observed that 60% of returns in January were due to incorrect sizes or color errors. Each return requires administrative and logistical processing, increasing refund times and impacting customer satisfaction. Along with the added logistical costs and operational expenses, this complicates payment reconciliation operations. A transaction recorded as an inflow in December may appear as an outflow in January, potentially generating another transaction if the customer exchanges the item or requests a refund. One can easily imagine the various reconciliation operations these triggers, the discrepancies to address, the lack of clarity, and the possibility of errors.
This phenomenon of massive returns is a global trend observed across multiple countries :
The main reasons for large volumes of returns and refunds include order errors (defective products, incorrect sizes), impulsive post-holiday purchases, and misunderstandings of promotional offers during sales. These factors significantly increase the need for payment reconciliation.
For example, during sales periods, limited-time promotions create pressure to buy quickly, leading to buyer remorse and an influx of returns. During the holiday season, gifts that weren’t chosen by the recipient often result in returns—wrong sizes, colors, or items that don’t fit their preferences. Ironically, the logistics company UPS declared January 2nd as “National Returns Day.” In 2022, the carrier handled an average of 1.75 million returned packages per day during this period.
Chargebacks, also known as payment reversals, can be categorized as follows:
Chargebacks lead to:
The cumulative costs of re-delivery, compensation, refunds, and the operational burden on finance and accounting (F&A) teams can significantly affect a company’s bottom line.
Some companies are reevaluating free return policies to reduce costs. Charging a nominal fee for returns could discourage abuse and decrease return volumes. However, this approach could also harm brand reputation and customer loyalty, particularly in the highly competitive e-commerce sector.
Other strategies to offset chargeback-related costs include:
When combined with automated financial reconciliation, these solutions can help e-commerce businesses and retailers absorb costs while maintaining a positive customer experience.
Automating the financial reconciliation process can significantly reduce the costs and challenges associated with chargebacks. Automation not only saves substantial time compared to manual tasks but also ensures accurate tracking of all inflows and outflows. This approach allows companies to identify anomalies before they escalate into disputes.
Regular, real-time monitoring helps prevent or mitigate significant losses. Tools that isolate transactions with discrepancies enable closer scrutiny of anomalies, faster detection of suspicious transactions, and a shift in financial teams’ focus from manual reconciliation to analysis and resolution.
Real-time transaction reconciliation is crucial for maintaining smooth operations. This includes automatic payment updates and clear financial reporting to anticipate potential issues.
Companies offering automated reconciliation solutions have reported a 25% reduction in chargeback-related disputes.
For e-commerce businesses and retailers, managing returns and chargebacks is a priority after peak activity periods. Effective financial reconciliation relies on automation, proactive anomaly detection, and real-time analysis. These approaches not only reduce costs but also enhance customer satisfaction, ensuring greater financial sustainability.
Discover how XREC can automate your payment reconciliation processes with precision, helping you track every discrepancy and chargeback effectively.
@2024 CALIXYS All rights reserved l Privacy policy l Terms and Conditions
